Froyanov wrote a


T. He says that "the capability to provoke intense, immediate emotions …[iscertainly the method that most clearly differentiates the film of history from history on paper" (Rosenstone 15). Pashuto, V. This simple observation carries an abundance of truth. V. Whatever the grammatically perfect language printed books can’t be compared to the advanced camera work directories are capable of showing their viewers scenes that are not adequately communicated in words. Kargalov, M. The act of reading of European Jews being executed is not like watching it on a screen. N. essays The reading of men who died from frigid temperatures in the Russian fronts doesn’t provide the same effect like watching it. Tikhomirov. The reason is straightforward that movies provide two things that books can’t or will not be able to provide images and sounds.

A. Films are able of re-creating the past in a manner that brings its viewers close to truth. A. This is the main goal in the production of historical films. Zimin and A. A lot of the films that were screened this semester had similar themes and also were asked to consider the source of blame and who the most disadvantaged people of this war are. N. Movies often skirt around certain issues that are controversial topics and, even when they do address the subject, they are simply printed text on the page. Sakharov have published monographs on the historical background of the process of unification . Films, on the other side, provide something more: the director is able to employ metaphors and other symbolic images to communicate a key message. Modern researchers I. They can also be able to avoid censorship through clever techniques that suggest possible controversial views, yet be sure to conceal them within the film’s plot. Ya.

There is always a struggle to determine the qualities of a great film and what constitutes a great historical film. Froyanov wrote a whole set of books that dealt with the difficulties of the historical development of the Russian state. This is a crucial one because films are often graphically and theatrically amazing however they cannot be great historical films in the absence of using what’s displayed on screen to communicate an important message. The problem-chronological method considers one of the aspects or phenomena in the life of the state and society.

Rosenstone states that "significant films have been made which provide a deeper understanding of, insights into and understanding about the life of people and let us be able to see, hear and learn a lot about the individual but also, in many instances the social and historical context" (Rosenstone 85). For example, it is a investigation of the history of politics of a country , or how foreign policy was implemented by the USSR. I am impressed by the fact the fact that Rosenstone states that films are able to aid in understanding the person’s environment or social context.

The synchronic technique helps the historian to observe patterns in the events taking place in various regions, political organizations and nations over the same time. It’s not enough to make a story and have characters in it; what is more crucial is to place characters within an environment that encourages critique and analysis which is what good films attempt to achieve. Particularly , studying revolutionary movements that began in the first 20 years of 20 V. In conclusion that watching and studying films from the past serves a more important and noble purpose as through studying films it is possible to improve the sharpness of our "historical lens" and eventually become more effective citizens in an open society that is situated in an increasingly diverse world.

This is the period of the protests of young people towards the conclusion of the 60-x years. The knowledge I gained through watching and analyzing these films helped to increase my appreciation of the past, but most important, it has helped me critically evaluate every thing I see, since it is through deliberation and analysis when the truth starts to be revealed. The method of retrospective analysis allows an opportunity for gradual immersion into the historical setting, followed by investigation of the root motives . Adam J. This method allows the historian to set up factual contexts to analyze a specific event. Ring is a junior who majors in Integrated Social Studies Education with minors in History. It is frequently utilized in the analysis of controversial events in the history. The study of History is a waste of time. The historical and comparative approach allows you to study certain things, events, or facts over a time period.

It is not worth our time to study history. of time as it distracts us from looking at current issues. In the monographs of historical studies you can find the comparison between the country’s achievements from 1913 year as well as other numbers from the year or time. The people of today live in the moment. The ideographic technique is comparable to the descriptive approach used to describe historical events. They make plans for and fret regarding the next year. Making a graphic and text outline of the events using documents and personal memoirs of the time and archival documents is one of the most important tasks for historians in their research.

The subject of history, however, studies the history of our past. From the standpoint of research in research, the statistical approach is the most precise method as it allows you to pinpoint not only the causes that are objective of the situation as well as to determine the most crucial factors in the process. In light of the pressures which are made by living in the moment and anticipating the future in the future The author says that studying history is not worth the time as it diverts our attention from the present challenges. Qualitative aspects of the objects of comparison. But, I don’t believe this as I believe that history is crucial to us and our society.

Methods of Induction and Deduction.